<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They&#8217;ve said it once before but it bears repeating</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hifiblog.com/past/2006/03/16/theyve-said-it-once-before-but-it-bears-repeating/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hifiblog.com/past/2006/03/16/theyve-said-it-once-before-but-it-bears-repeating/</link>
	<description>Interesting news/reviews/deals from the portable audio market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:21:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Volkher Hofmann</title>
		<link>http://hifiblog.com/past/2006/03/16/theyve-said-it-once-before-but-it-bears-repeating/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Volkher Hofmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 10:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hifiblog.com/past/2006/03/16/theyve-said-it-once-before-but-it-bears-repeating/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Konstantinos,

the iPod shuffle (best ad camaign ever ... you don&#039;t get anything and THAT&#039;S cool, man) was at the top of my list for a long time. I just don&#039;t like the whole rechargable battery mess they produced in the past. I don&#039;t feel like dishing out too much cash within a predictable time frame just to keep the player running.

Besides, as I stated elsewhere on your site, I&#039;m not such a big Apple fan anymore .. at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Konstantinos,</p>
<p>the iPod shuffle (best ad camaign ever &#8230; you don&#8217;t get anything and THAT&#8217;S cool, man) was at the top of my list for a long time. I just don&#8217;t like the whole rechargable battery mess they produced in the past. I don&#8217;t feel like dishing out too much cash within a predictable time frame just to keep the player running.</p>
<p>Besides, as I stated elsewhere on your site, I&#8217;m not such a big Apple fan anymore .. at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konstantinos Christidis</title>
		<link>http://hifiblog.com/past/2006/03/16/theyve-said-it-once-before-but-it-bears-repeating/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Konstantinos Christidis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 23:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hifiblog.com/past/2006/03/16/theyve-said-it-once-before-but-it-bears-repeating/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Volkher, thanks for sharing your thoughts.

I was going to state the usual about how sonic performance is rated subjectively, etc. but I&#039;ll skip this and ask you whether you&#039;ve tested the iPod shuffle. I think that sound-wise it&#039;s great, but don&#039;t take my word for it; people who know their stuff and whose opinions I value greatly over at the Head-Fi forums have been saying the same thing time and time again. And hey, even Apple&#039;s engineers consider the Shuffle to be the &quot;golden standard&quot; to which all iPods are compared. Have a listen, maybe you&#039;re in for a surprise.

Plus, it&#039;s aligned perfectly with your &quot;I&#039;d rather have a smaller player that drops all the gadgetry and gives me the best possible sound&quot; sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Volkher, thanks for sharing your thoughts.</p>
<p>I was going to state the usual about how sonic performance is rated subjectively, etc. but I&#8217;ll skip this and ask you whether you&#8217;ve tested the iPod shuffle. I think that sound-wise it&#8217;s great, but don&#8217;t take my word for it; people who know their stuff and whose opinions I value greatly over at the Head-Fi forums have been saying the same thing time and time again. And hey, even Apple&#8217;s engineers consider the Shuffle to be the &#8220;golden standard&#8221; to which all iPods are compared. Have a listen, maybe you&#8217;re in for a surprise.</p>
<p>Plus, it&#8217;s aligned perfectly with your &#8220;I&#8217;d rather have a smaller player that drops all the gadgetry and gives me the best possible sound&#8221; sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Volkher Hofmann</title>
		<link>http://hifiblog.com/past/2006/03/16/theyve-said-it-once-before-but-it-bears-repeating/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Volkher Hofmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 22:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hifiblog.com/past/2006/03/16/theyve-said-it-once-before-but-it-bears-repeating/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>That Samsung looks sweet, and I&#039;m game for a new player as mine is beginning to sputter, but my biggest complaint about the avalanche of new players hitting the market is sound quality.

I don&#039;t know how many players I had a look at these past weeks and if you want small and reasonably priced players, crummy sound quality is almost a given. I mean, you could hook &#039;em up to a tube amp and Stax headphones and 98% sound like utter crap. They make my ears bleed.

I&#039;d rather have a smaller player that drops all the gadgetry and gives me the best possible sound. Ever since iRiver I haven&#039;t really seen much development in that area. Their players sound mighty fine, but they&#039;re too big for my needs and/or too expensive. Incidentally, at my local brick-and-mortar store, those rather old iRiver models are still very hot sellers with the audiophile crowd. The prices have unfortunately stayed absolutely stable because of that. No price-reduction in sight.

I&#039;d also rather have a cell phone that enables me to speak to people and offers rock-solid quality. I don&#039;t need one that takes pictures, plays music, plugs into Windoze, cooks my evening meals and does my tax return (on second thought, the latter ...).

Just call me old-fashioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Samsung looks sweet, and I&#8217;m game for a new player as mine is beginning to sputter, but my biggest complaint about the avalanche of new players hitting the market is sound quality.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how many players I had a look at these past weeks and if you want small and reasonably priced players, crummy sound quality is almost a given. I mean, you could hook &#8216;em up to a tube amp and Stax headphones and 98% sound like utter crap. They make my ears bleed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather have a smaller player that drops all the gadgetry and gives me the best possible sound. Ever since iRiver I haven&#8217;t really seen much development in that area. Their players sound mighty fine, but they&#8217;re too big for my needs and/or too expensive. Incidentally, at my local brick-and-mortar store, those rather old iRiver models are still very hot sellers with the audiophile crowd. The prices have unfortunately stayed absolutely stable because of that. No price-reduction in sight.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also rather have a cell phone that enables me to speak to people and offers rock-solid quality. I don&#8217;t need one that takes pictures, plays music, plugs into Windoze, cooks my evening meals and does my tax return (on second thought, the latter &#8230;).</p>
<p>Just call me old-fashioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

